Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:49

Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
USA roster: 15 MLS players called for 2025 Concacaf Gold Cup - MLSsoccer.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Steelers sign Aaron Rodgers, pending a physical - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
The 10-Year Auction and Inflation Data Could Jolt the Bond Market - Barron's
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Founder of 23andMe buys back company out of bankruptcy auction - Ars Technica
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why We Still Can't Find A Solar System Twin - IFLScience
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.